On the Returns DVD, Burton said that he heard people who saw BR thought it was either lighter or darker than B89. Also, almost everyone I have ever talked to said they were turned off by the tone of both B89 and Returns.
Personally I think B89 was somewhat darker than Returns in that the people on the streets looked seedy such as homeless people, drug dealers, hookers, etc. Gotham City in general looked like it wreaked of corruption and crime and felt so oppressive. The overall tone of the movie was just gritty, as it was supposed to be. The part of the film which I would argue is the darkest is the scene where Bruce recalls the murder of his parents. This to me is the heart of the picture as well as the character.
As for Returns, it was darker in that the look was more black. Stefan Czapsky said it best when he quoted a film critic who said Returns looked like it was shot in an ink well. I did think that some of the locations of Returns looked just as seedy as B89 such as the churchyard where the Penguin visits, the alley where the Catwoman attacks that mugger, the street where Batman lands after gliding off that building, the alley where Batman looses the cops via Batmissile, and the background of the street where Batman knocks Catwoman off the roof into that kitty litter truck.
I would say Returns is lighter in contrast to B89 because the people in Gotham City looked more clean and welcoming like in a 1950's movie. Also some of the buildings looked cleaner than the buildings in B89, like the Shreck building and Gotham City Hall. The fact that it takes place at Christmas makes it a little lighter too.
Basically, I think both movies are dark as hell and they both feel like the same city, but if you made me choose which one is darker I'd have to say B89.
Personally I think B89 was somewhat darker than Returns in that the people on the streets looked seedy such as homeless people, drug dealers, hookers, etc. Gotham City in general looked like it wreaked of corruption and crime and felt so oppressive. The overall tone of the movie was just gritty, as it was supposed to be. The part of the film which I would argue is the darkest is the scene where Bruce recalls the murder of his parents. This to me is the heart of the picture as well as the character.
As for Returns, it was darker in that the look was more black. Stefan Czapsky said it best when he quoted a film critic who said Returns looked like it was shot in an ink well. I did think that some of the locations of Returns looked just as seedy as B89 such as the churchyard where the Penguin visits, the alley where the Catwoman attacks that mugger, the street where Batman lands after gliding off that building, the alley where Batman looses the cops via Batmissile, and the background of the street where Batman knocks Catwoman off the roof into that kitty litter truck.
I would say Returns is lighter in contrast to B89 because the people in Gotham City looked more clean and welcoming like in a 1950's movie. Also some of the buildings looked cleaner than the buildings in B89, like the Shreck building and Gotham City Hall. The fact that it takes place at Christmas makes it a little lighter too.
Basically, I think both movies are dark as hell and they both feel like the same city, but if you made me choose which one is darker I'd have to say B89.