Continuity

Started by Slash Man, Sun, 5 Oct 2014, 04:39

Previous topic - Next topic
Now, this is something Batman & Robin doesn't seem to get much credit for (and we all know Batman & Robin doesn't get much credit at all); continuity between films.

Much of this is written from the perspective of my child self. But Schumacher's films were catered more towards the younger audience, so this shouldn't be too much of a shock. Anyways, Batman Forever and Batman & Robin were the two films that really meshed together well. The "other" Batmans (which I only caught on television airings) seemed like their own entities. But there was something about the tone and characters that kept BF and B&R on the same level. Despite Bruce Wayne being different, Chris O'Donnell provided the necessary segue. The Burton films were all pretty standalone (changing love interests, less Gordon, no Harvey Dent), but relationship between Bruce and Dick was something that made me feel like I was watching a series.

Don't get me wrong, Burton's films are both gems, but I realize they don't actually put forth a larger story. Despite seeming more like a reboot to me, Batman Forever actually has decent ties with the first movie and Batman's background, and initiates connective ties that go beyond just having the same actor. In this sense, Batman Returns is pretty inconsequential; I might experiment and try watching Batman and Batman Forever back to back...

Shumacher did a decent job with continuity, but he wasn't that great in other ares.

I don't think any of the 3 sequels adds more continuity than the others, maybe BR has a slight edge;

Batman returns: Vicky Vale referenced twice.
Batman Forever: Chase making a Catwoman reference
Batman & Robin: conversation about the flying graysons, the brief shot of two face and the riddler suits, and Alfreds joke about bringing the batmobile back in one piece (as it had been damaged in both of the previous 2 films).


Now I wonder how much of this was WB's doing? We all know they wanted to market these films for the kids so it stands to reason that they wouldn't want to over reference the other films to avoid making it a prerequisite to see the previous films.

going by what you said about returns, slash, maybe it was just horrid christmastime nightmare for bruce.

naaaah. but i get your point. i guess part of its gloriousness is it stands alone like that.

Quote from: riddler on Sun,  5 Oct  2014, 16:55
I don't think any of the 3 sequels adds more continuity than the others, maybe BR has a slight edge;

Batman returns: Vicky Vale referenced twice.
Batman Forever: Chase making a Catwoman reference
Batman & Robin: conversation about the flying graysons, the brief shot of two face and the riddler suits, and Alfreds joke about bringing the batmobile back in one piece (as it had been damaged in both of the previous 2 films).


Now I wonder how much of this was WB's doing? We all know they wanted to market these films for the kids so it stands to reason that they wouldn't want to over reference the other films to avoid making it a prerequisite to see the previous films.
Thing is, I don't really count the passing references as really strong connectors, the Catwoman one seemed kinda cryptic to those not attentive. Penguin's mention of eagle scouts turning into "crazed clowns" might be a reference to the Joker, but no more than an Easter egg.

I'm just saying while all the films tend to stand alone, Forever and Batman & Robin seem the most connected.

I always thought the "crazed clowns" wasn't a reference to The Joker but the all the goons with the clown face paint in Returns. Such as the one who takes Selena hostage at the beginning.

I never really made the connection......
Ohhhh, that looks like fun! Lemme try! *Lemme try!* Ball up the fist, reach way back, and assert your... OW!!


Don't forget the Batwing. That certainly counts as continuity for me. Not sure about the Batboat though because the BatSKIboat was a radically different design. And Forever's seemed like more of a homage to Adam West's tv model.

My favorite connection is the great dialogue between Bruce and Dick in the Batcave: "Your family wasn't killed by a maniac....Yes, they were!". If the flashback of the Wayne murders wasn't enough to convince you, a fairly decent recreation of the sequence from the original movie, this dialogue most certainly will. Bruce is not talking about some mere Joe Chill thug here when relating his past to a shocked Robin. Jack Napier was clearly established as an "A1 nut boy" prior to becoming The Joker. Who else could he possibly be referring to?

Furthermore in a deleted scene there was further emphasis on the past history which I'm sad was cut because it rams the point home even more. Alfred announces to Bruce that his "parents are avenged..." by the death of Napier, ergo mission technically complete, when asking him to consider retiring.


Quote from: Cobblepot4Mayor on Thu, 16 Jul  2015, 17:29
Furthermore in a deleted scene there was further emphasis on the past history which I'm sad was cut because it rams the point home even more. Alfred announces to Bruce that his "parents are avenged..." by the death of Napier, ergo mission technically complete, when asking him to consider retiring.

That was my favourite deleted scene and I was disappointed it was cut out...except I thought it was out of character for Bruce when said that he never felt in love before when Alfred encouraged him to start dating Chase Meridian. It's like he forgot about Vicki and Selina.
QuoteJonathan Nolan: He [Batman] has this one rule, as the Joker says in The Dark Knight. But he does wind up breaking it. Does he break it in the third film?

Christopher Nolan: He breaks it in...

Jonathan Nolan: ...the first two.

Source: http://books.google.com.au/books?id=uwV8rddtKRgC&pg=PR8&dq=But+he+does+wind+up+breaking+it.&hl=en&sa=X&ei

Quote from: The Laughing Fish on Fri, 17 Jul  2015, 10:01
Quote from: Cobblepot4Mayor on Thu, 16 Jul  2015, 17:29
Furthermore in a deleted scene there was further emphasis on the past history which I'm sad was cut because it rams the point home even more. Alfred announces to Bruce that his "parents are avenged..." by the death of Napier, ergo mission technically complete, when asking him to consider retiring.

That was my favourite deleted scene and I was disappointed it was cut out...except I thought it was out of character for Bruce when said that he never felt in love before when Alfred encouraged him to start dating Chase Meridian. It's like he forgot about Vicki and Selina.
He knew Selina for about a week.

Mon, 27 Jul 2015, 00:58 #9 Last Edit: Mon, 27 Jul 2015, 22:33 by thecolorsblend
I think the whole point of Vicki's struggles with Bruce in B89 was that he clearly didn't love her. Like Dagenspear says, he only knew Selina for about a week. If that.

More continuity. Riddler broke into Wayne Manor and then 'sploded the Batcave real good. Later Batman wanders down to the lower level by the water and tries to decide between taking the Batboat or the Batwing to confront Two Face and the Riddler.

The Batcave's destruction wasn't explicitly mentioned in B&R... but it wasn't swept under the rug either. Most of the action in the Batcave in B&R takes place on the lower level. It's as if Bruce hasn't completely repaired all the damage done BF. Or maybe isn't planning to.

For a movie series that doesn't get much credit for continuity, that's a good catch on Schumacher's part.