Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - johnnygobbs

#21
Quote from: Dagenspear on Tue,  4 Aug  2020, 00:04
I think Batman Returns is an entertaining movie. As weird as it may seem, it and Batman 89 are some of the movies of my childhood. But I think it's missing elements and potential ideas that could tie the franchise together and further build on character dynamics and story elements that I think have already been set up, to me, in the movie in some ways. Here are the ideas God blessed me with for that:

The motive is more tied to Harvey Dent thinking the police need more financial backing, but the mayor is content to let Batman do all the work for the police, who Dent thinks they've become too reliant on.

This adds another element that fills out the idea of mistrust against Batman that the movie later touches on when he's framed by Penguin. And adds a more thorough thematic element that, while I think may be in the movie already, I think is mainly left in the Selina and Bruce last scenes they have together, where I think it comes off like Bruce has learned some form of lesson, in seeing Selina's viscous dark attitude and how it relates to him and now thinking that they're not above the law.

The stress of the job has begun to get to Dent and he's been blacking out and losing time, and seeing a therapist to deal with his problems and talk about his childhood abuse at the hands of his dad, him killing his dad in defense of his mom as he used his coin to force young Harvey what would happen.

Harvey has begun trying to use flipping the coin to make choices for himself as a way to relieve his stress.

Penguin approaches Harvey as a way to help him get his foothold, Harvey being the trusted figure that he is. Harvey thinks he may be able to use the situation to get Penguin in run for mayor and get the funding for the police department and less dependent on Batman.

Selina being his assistant, who accidentally stumbles across the file and information on his mental state and when Dent catches her, her trying to suggest that he step down (Harvey being unwilling to for his fear of leaving Gotham to be consumed by its insanity, him pressuring himself that he has to protect it), the stress of this causing him to snap and transition into his darker personality that takes over in his blackouts. This dark version pushing Selina out the window, in a perception of the ends of justify the means.

Naturally the change equals a change in how Bruce and Harvey interact, as opposed to how Bruce and Shreck interact. Now the dynamic is more one of opposing perspectives that Bruce begins to see Harvey's side of in the situation about Batman and how Batman may be responsible for the current insanity of their situation. We can maybe even parallel the idea of Bruce's obsession to save Gotham being connected to his parents death and Harvey's obsession to do so and how he pressures himself to is connected to him feeling powerless as a child to protect his mom and how he killed his dad to do so.

His mental breaking begins to become harsher, after finding out that he's made a deal with a criminal in Oswald, the stress beginning to consume him.

At the end, the stress finally causes a complete break when he's taken by Penguin (for Harvey turning on him after realizing what he is), and is nearly killed by Selina, him trying to kill her in his darker persona, and then her electrocuting him, burning half his face.

Amongst the ending parts of the movie, Bruce visits Harvey in the hospital, apologizing for failing him and the city, later showing Harvey no longer in his bed, and ending on an uncertain not for Bruce about himself and how he relates to the city.

Please review and tell me what you think!
As a narrative concerning the rise and fall of Harvey Dent, I really like your synopsis.  I like his background (i.e. the abusive childhood which forced him to commit murder, and how it contrasts with Bruce Wayne's similarly traumatic background, albeit one in which Bruce was at least blessed with two loving and caring parents for the first few years of his life).  I also like the idea of Selina as Dent's assistant, as it suggests a more idealistic background for her, as opposed to working as the 'executive assistant' (I mean secretary...) of a corporate bigwig.

But I still think your ideas would work better for an alternative Batman Forever, or even as a subplot to Batman Returns, as opposed to the central story.

There isn't really a big existential baddie master-scheme, akin to The Penguin planning to kidnap and drown Gotham's firstborn, and when that fails, destroy all of Gotham with rocket-carrying penguins.  It reads more like a fascinating psychological arthouse-style story, almost akin to say last year's The Joker, as opposed to a blockbuster action/adventure film (which is great in its own right, but wouldn't really have worked for a 1992 summer tentpole CBM).  Dent is also much more sympathetic than Shreck, and arguably too conflicted to be consigned to the 'Big Bad' role, in contrast to the odious Max Shreck.  Selina's decision to get revenge on Max feels much more of a righteous crusade against a cold-blooded capitalist overlord than it would had she instead sought out to avenge Dent, who comes across as a similarly tragic and damaged victim of abuse as opposed to a truly loathsome monster.

That's why Shreck was such a great character (although I'd have preferred it if Daniel Waters had instead incorporated Rupert Thorne or a another pre-established comic-book character in the corporate baddie role - someone like Marlon Brando, Brian Cox or Brendan Gleeson would have been perfect in that role).  He's the one Batman Returns villain who doesn't have a truly tragic background (it is suggested that he is a self-made man, and we also learn that his wife is dead, albeit possibly at his own hands, but compared to the film's other main characters, Bruce, Oswald and Selina, Max is relatively 'normal' and fairly angst-free), and thus he is the one character in the film that is perfectly okay for us to despise and anticipate his downfall.

Still, I do like many of your ideas, even if I think they work better as a side story to the main action, leading up to a cliffhanger in which Harvey Dent becomes Two-Face and thus the main villain in Batman 3/Batman Forever.

Maybe Dent, rather than the mayor, is the one who is blocking Max's power plant scheme, and maybe it is Max, in conjunction with The Penguin and his goons, who conspires to have him killed (except his 'accident' doesn't finish him off, but simply leaves him physically and mentally scarred), and perhaps Selina is 'killed' because she was the one who uncovered Max's plan to murder Dent.  Even better, perhaps Selina was a plant in Max's office, and was in fact working as an informant for Dent who had his suspicions about Max's criminal activities, and when Max discovered this, he pushed Selina out of his skyscraper building.
#22
For all of my fellow Batman Returns fans, I'd really recommend the following interview with Daniel Waters, focusing solely on this specific writing credit, conducted a few days ago:

https://diaboliquemagazine.com/episode-13-a-conversation-with-daniel-waters/

During the interview, Waters discusses his approach to writing a Batman script, his positive working relationship with Tim Burton (and his practically non-existent one with fellow Batman Returns screenwriter, Wesley Strick), his preference for writing for Catwoman and The Penguin over Batman, the function of Max Shreck's character, the thinking behind The Ice Princess character, his relative lack of interest in Commissioner Gordon, the positive response to the screenplay provided by Michelle Pfeiffer (as well as that of Annette Bening, who was originally set to play Catwoman), the notes Danny DeVito provided on his character, his negative feelings towards Batman '89, his displeasure at the way David Goyer and Christopher Nolan have, in his opinion, talked down Batman Returns, and his and Burton's differing approaches to devising the Pfeiffer-led Catwoman spinoff that never was.  He also debunks the myth that Harvey Dent was ever supposed to have any type of significant role in this movie (it seems pretty clear that, contrary to popular rumour, Dent was never a forerunner to Max Shreck).

Anyway, this is definitely worth checking out for anyone curious about the genesis of Batman Returns, and it's a pleasure to listen to the enthusiasm that the interviewer, Lee Gambin, evidently has for this wonderful and truly unique Batman film.
#23
Movies / Re: The RoboCop Thread
Mon, 20 Jul 2020, 21:36
Galyn Görg was a very beautiful woman.  It was sad to read of her passing (a day before her 56th birthday) from cancer, at a similar age to Kelly Preston (Space Camp, Twins), who also died from cancer very recently.

Funnily enough, I'm currently listening to the Robocop 2 episode from Reel Comic Heroes Podcast, a podcast that I highly recommend (since it covers many of the type of films we like discussing on this very site): https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCyaZheOwVnP0fFkeRhj07xw/videos
#24
Quote from: Silver Nemesis on Thu, 16 Jul  2020, 20:08
Quote from: johnnygobbs on Fri, 10 Jul  2020, 17:13This sounds exactly like the show I expected "Gotham" to be.  I hope this one finally lives up to those expectations.

The one red flag for me is the report of it being a prequel to the Reeves film. If so, it's going to be yet another Batman-without-Batman series. A proper Gotham Central show, taking place after Batman is established, would be better IMO. Batman doesn't need to appear in the series, but he should exist somewhere in the universe. Otherwise it seems silly when major villains turn up before Batman has made his debut. Unless of course they're just going to focus on gangsters rather than 'freaks', in which case it could work.

Still, Reeves is involved and the show is directly connected to the new Pattinson movie, so I'm hopeful they'll pull it off. If nothing else, it should be an improvement on Gotham.
Thanks for your comments.  :)

I wouldn't like to see too many of the 'freaks' within Batman's Rogues Gallery established in a prequel TV show, although we could see the Falcone, Zucco and Maroni crime families make some appearances, and maybe even Rupert Thorne, who has yet to make an appearance in live-action.  Perhaps even a cameo for Joe Chill, whilst also keeping him as a shadowy, anonymous figure.

That said, I am ambivalent about the idea that Batman 'created' his worst enemies, because it rather undermines Batman's heroism.  If he was the catalyst for the emergence of the 'freaks', doesn't that unambiguously demonstrate that Batman is more of a hindrance than a help to his city?

Although I have mixed feelings about Joker, I have to say, as a side note, that I rather like the idea that it is The Joker that created Batman, and not Batman who created The Joker (Batman '89 of course, has it both ways).
#25
The Batman (2022) / Gotham PD Spin-off TV Show
Fri, 10 Jul 2020, 17:13
https://www.superherohype.com/tv/483488-hbo-max-orders-the-batman-spinoff-series-following-the-gotham-pd

Quote'Next year, director Matt Reeves will bring DC's Dark Knight back to the big screen in The Batman. However, it appears that Reeves plans to expand his world of Gotham City into television as well. HBO Max has announced that Reeves is teaming up with producer Dylan Clark, and Boardwalk Empire creator Terrence Winter to create a new TV series that shares continuity with The Batman. Although the new show doesn't have a title, it will be be "an original DC drama set in the Gotham City police department."

According to HBO Max, the new series will also "build upon the motion picture's examination of the anatomy of corruption in Gotham City, ultimately launching a new Batman universe across multiple platforms. The news comes just a year after Gotham ended its five season run on Fox. It's also seems likely that the new series will take its cues from Ed Brubaker, Greg Rucka, and Michael Lark's Gotham Central comic from 2002. That comic book series shared the same essential premise that Reeves and Winter will explore.

"This is an amazing opportunity," said Reeves in a statement. "Not only to expand the vision of the world I am creating in the film, but to explore it in the kind of depth and detail that only a longform format can afford — and getting to work with the incredibly talented Terence Winter, who has written so insightfully and powerfully about worlds of crime and corruption, is an absolute dream."

"Our collaboration with Warner Bros. and DC allows us to elaborate and grow fan connections across these powerful brands for years to come," added HBO Max's Kevin Reilly. "This is Batman as most audiences have never seen before. And we know fans will want to spend more time in this new world inspired by the film."

The new series doesn't have a start date yet. But presumably casting will begin later this year.'

This sounds exactly like the show I expected "Gotham" to be.  I hope this one finally lives up to those expectations.
#26
Quote from: Silver Nemesis on Tue, 23 Jun  2020, 12:06If there's one other actor from the Burtonverse they should bring back, my vote goes to Pfeiffer. I'd love to catch up with what's been happening between Bruce and Selina over the past 28 years. Perhaps Billy Dee Williams could also put in an appearance as Two-Face. Maybe we'll even get to see a Burtonverse Arkham populated by Burtonised versions of Scarecrow and Riddler. Perhaps Bat-Keaton will get to meet Cavill's Superman and Gadot's Wonder Woman further down the line. There's so much potential here.
I don't know.  Would it be too much to ask for a cameo from Nicholas Cage as the Burtonverse Superman?  Or what about Marlon Wayans as Robin?  He's been getting paid for the part since 1992 after all.  He might as well do something to earn that keep.

As for Billy Dee Williams.  It's a shame his opportunity to play an active Two-Face went by, but I kind of like the idea that his is the one version of Harvey Dent that remained a good guy.  I'd welcome a BDW cameo but as Harvey Dent not as a 'Two-Face' simply languishing in Arkham Asylum.  BDW and his version of Harvey Dent deserve better than that.

But a Michelle Pfeiffer cameo would be the icing on the cake.

Also, in view of how sophisticated modern CGI is, I wonder if there would be an opportunity for The Flash to reserve-flash into Batman's past and help him correct some of his regrets/mistakes/tragedies, which might potentially offer room for more cameos.
#27
Quote from: Silver Nemesis on Mon, 22 Jun  2020, 20:37
The Wrap has posted some alleged plot details explaining how Bat-Keaton will cross over with the DCEU. If this is true, then Schumacher's movies will no longer be canonical sequels to the Burton films.
Shame about the timing...

Honestly, I consider Forever and B&R to be canon to the Burton films, but ideally we'd be getting a genuine sequel to Returns, or a Pfeiffer Catwoman spin-off.

#28
Comic Film & TV / Re: JRR Tolkien Discussion
Mon, 22 Jun 2020, 20:17
Speaking of The Lord of the Rings, I just want to say Rest in Peace to one of my all-time favourite actors, Sir Ian Holm, who died on Friday at the age of 88.

He was superb in so many films, including Alien, Time Bandits, Chariots of Fire, Dreamchild, and The Sweet Hereafter, perhaps his finest performance, but he will be known to many as Bilbo Baggins, one of the most spot-on pieces of casting in film history.  I won't post a gif here, because it gives me the shivers, but the scene where he goes from the placid, sweet and unassuming Bilbo we all love to a snarling and monstrous ring-obsessed junkie, in the blink of a second, has to be one of the biggest fright-jumps in film.

Rest in Peace.
#29
Misc. Schumacher / Re: R.I.P Joel Schumacher
Mon, 22 Jun 2020, 19:53
At the time of their release, I was very ambivalent about the Schumacher Batman films, as like many of you (I suspect) I dearly wanted a third Burton Batman instalment, but over time I've learned to love Batman Forever and Batman & Robin, and appreciate Schumacher's iteration of the character as a particularly unique take, the like of which we're unlikely to ever get again, in this era of mostly very earnest and ultra-serious comic-book movies (Guardians of the Galaxy, and Thor: Ragnarok excepted).  Now we've had the Nolan-verse and the Snyder films, and we're soon to get a Reeves franchise (hopefully), it seems very churlish to criticise the Schumacher films for their campness and silliness.

Schumacher ultimately made family-friendly Batman films (unlike the Burton, Nolan, Snyder, and presumably Reeves' films, there is very little in BF or B&R that is unsuitable for a pre-teen, and even the more adult stuff mostly flies under the radar), that embraced the colour and vibrancy of the comics, particularly from the post-Hayes Code 1950s and 60s era, giving us genuinely fantastical, vivid, and occasionally super-powered villains.  His films were also extremely sexy, and embraced both the female, and male, physical form in a genre that had hitherto mostly reduced women to simpering sex objects whilst ignoring the female, or indeed gay male, gaze.  Schumacher's Batman films are also very underrated in terms of his occasionally inspired casting (Carrey was a great pick for The Riddler, and his performance is one of the most memorable in the entire Batman movie canon, and although Schwarzenegger was, unfortunately, lumbered with some terrible one-liners that undercut the character's innate tragedy, I could totally see what Schumacher was aiming for when he said that Freeze should be "big and strong like he was chiseled out of a glacier").

But the campy occasionally 'so bad it's good' fun of his Batman films apart, it's easy and unfair to ignore the rest of Schumacher's genuinely impressive filmography, including the legitimately excellent likes of The Lost Boys, Flatliners, Falling Down (one of the most provocative and thought-provoking studio films to come out of 1990s Hollywood), The Client, A Time to Kill, Tigerland, and Phonebooth, as well as the massively underrated St. Elmo's Fire (although I may be alone on that one).  And as Silver Nemesis points out, he came across as a very likeable character, and one I should add, was refreshingly candid and open about the type of prima donna behaviour and bad attitudes of his colleagues and peers, that send most celebs and Hollywood types into PR overdrive.

So, Rest in Peace Joel, and thanks for all the great films.
#30
What a weird day.  My head is all over the place right now.

I saw this news first, and welcomed it with cautious excitement.  I still have some apprehension about any canonical follow-up to Batman '89 and Batman Returns that isn't directed by Tim Burton (even if I do regard Batman Forever, Batman & Robin, and even Catwoman, as loose sequels), particularly in view of the different aesthetics and mindsets that dominate today's superhero milieu.  I would not, for instance, have been happy to see Keaton appear in CW's Crisis on Infinite Earths, as I utterly despise the CW.  But the solo Flash movie is reportedly being directed by Andy Muschetti, who helmed one of my favourite genre films of the last ten years (2017's It, the sequel of which is also pretty good if not quite up to the same quality - incidentally, the first It is set during the summer of 1989, and you can even spot a theater marquee displaying 'Batman').  So, like I say, I'm cautiously excited.

I also saw the sad news, in very quick succession, of Joel Schumacher's death at the age of 80, and so, like I also say, my head is a bit all over the place at the moment, speaking as an aficionado of the Burton/Schumacher era of Batman films.