I have done a bunch of legal research. First I should note that law is not my first language or anything.
Anyway, from what I have concluded, nothing Batman has ever done in 89 is murder. People tell me all the time he is a murderer but when I looked up the law in regards to murder, citizen's arrests and even the castle doctrine, I don't understand why it is murder. I think some people are just convinced it's murder because to, for example, blow up axis chemicals with those men inside at a moment where they are not shooting at you makes it murder. But according to the research I've done I don't think that's true.
I want to get opinions on this as it is impossible to have logical discussions with people on places like imdb for example where basically anything Burton did was crap and anything Nolan did was great and therefore 89 Batman has to be a murderer etc.
I was just wondering, can anyone make a more clear legal argument that Batman isn't a murderer? I'd make mine but I've made it a million times so I wanna hear other opinions. In my researched legal opinion, he is definitely NOT a murderer. I find anyone who thinks he's a murderer is hellbent and stuck on one idea, and doesn't seem to even entertain all the legal reasons why he is not. But like I said, I'm not a lawyer.
Please, would love some thoughts on this.
Anyway, from what I have concluded, nothing Batman has ever done in 89 is murder. People tell me all the time he is a murderer but when I looked up the law in regards to murder, citizen's arrests and even the castle doctrine, I don't understand why it is murder. I think some people are just convinced it's murder because to, for example, blow up axis chemicals with those men inside at a moment where they are not shooting at you makes it murder. But according to the research I've done I don't think that's true.
I want to get opinions on this as it is impossible to have logical discussions with people on places like imdb for example where basically anything Burton did was crap and anything Nolan did was great and therefore 89 Batman has to be a murderer etc.
I was just wondering, can anyone make a more clear legal argument that Batman isn't a murderer? I'd make mine but I've made it a million times so I wanna hear other opinions. In my researched legal opinion, he is definitely NOT a murderer. I find anyone who thinks he's a murderer is hellbent and stuck on one idea, and doesn't seem to even entertain all the legal reasons why he is not. But like I said, I'm not a lawyer.
Please, would love some thoughts on this.