Quote from: thecolorsblend on Wed, 13 Sep 2023, 15:52Eventually, somebody close to the production decided the show needed a recurring antagonist. And since Lex Luthor is a tough act to follow, Intergang was drafted in to serve as a menace to Metropolis and our heroes. Believe it or not, this was a very clever and effective move. The Intergang-related episodes tended to be the most highly rated this season (although guest appearances from stars like Bruce Campbell and Raquel Welch probably helped too, let's be fair).
I suppose the tradition of a having a 'big bad' each season didn't come along until Buffy, but I always saw Intergang as an attempt to fill the recurring villain role that Lex occupied in the first season. It's a pity they didn't tie Intergang into the plot of the season finale, perhaps having Bill Church Jr. being the one to discover Tempus's journal and blackmail Clark.
Then Nor could've been the big bad of season 3. They could have hinted at his existence earlier in the season. 'Contact' dealt with fake alien abductions. There could have been a scene at the end of that episode where it's revealed real aliens are monitoring Earth, thus foreshadowing the invasion to come.
Quote from: thecolorsblend on Wed, 13 Sep 2023, 15:52Another addition was Mayson Drake. A semi-rival to Lois and a semi-inversion of Lois, Mayson had eyes for Clark while keeping Superman at arm's length (at best). Even better, Mayson is someone that Clark could've realistically fallen for. The Superman angle would've become an issue at some point. But aside from that, Mayson and Clark aren't miles apart in terms of their worldview. It's not science-fiction to think that Clark could've built something with her under other circumstances. I understand that Mayson was meant to serve a specific function in the show. Only this and nothing more. But still, the character's death hit hard precisely because of how well the character worked on the show and, let's face it, what a good match Farrah Forke was for the L&C universe.
Mayson's a likeable character, but I was less keen on Dan Scardino. He always struck me as a bargain basement Martin Riggs, and his insertion into the show at that point felt like a transparent delaying tactic to stop Lois and Clark from getting together.
Quote from: thecolorsblend on Wed, 13 Sep 2023, 15:52Ratings were BAD. The show was teetering on the edge. So, The Source asked "What exactly do you people want to see?"
Apparently, the answer was fairly unanimous. "We want Lois and Clark to go on a date!" Several people also mentioned Lex Luthor, more of Bronson Pinchot (Kyle Griffin/The Prankster, one of the more popular "Pinky & The Brain villains") and time travel.
The Source was noncommittal aside from thanking us for sharing while making no promises.
And yet, Lois and Clark went on a date, Lex Luthor came back, Pinchot came back and sure nuff there was a time travel episode.
This sounds like the complete opposite of the situation we have now. Modern WB: "We cooouuuld give the fans the live-action Batman Beyond they've been asking for... Nah, let's give 'em Creature Commandoes instead. They'll love that."
It's strange to think there was a time when studios might have been receptive to fan suggestions. I remember back around 2010, after Schwarzenegger made a cameo in The Expendables, there was talk of him making his comeback as an action star. A thread appeared on the IMDb in which the OP asked fans what kind of movie they'd like to see Arnold star in as his comeback vehicle – a sci-fi movie, a war film, a cop thriller, a western, a fantasy epic? The overwhelming consensus was that he should make a western. About a year later it was announced that his first leading role upon his return to acting would be in The Last Stand (2013), which was a western.
It might've been a coincidence, but I've always wondered if Arnold's management had read or perhaps even created that IMDb thread.
Quote from: thecolorsblend on Wed, 13 Sep 2023, 15:52Now, we should emphasize that L&C was never a Top 20 show. At no point in its history did it ever compete with The Big Boys like The Simpsons, Friends, Seinfeld and other shows.
If Wikipedia's sources are accurate then it looks to me as though L&C was averaging more viewers during its third (1995-96) season than the seventh season of The Simpsons was at the same time. The following LA Times article reports that L&C s3 averaged 18.4 million viewers: https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1997-06-14-ca-3130-story.html
The highest rated episode was 'Ultra Woman', which attracted 22.3 million viewers. The highest rated episode of The Simpsons s7 was 'Who Shot Mr Burns? – Part II', which had 22.6 million viewers. I don't know the average for the whole of The Simpsons s7, but Wikipedia lists most of the episodes as garnering around 14-17 million, which is less than L&C was averaging at the time. L&C's ratings started to decline during the last four episodes of the season, but prior to that it was almost consistently getting 18-20 million viewers throughout its third year.
According to the following site, L&C s3 ranked 44th overall for that season, while The Simpsons s7 ranked 77th: http://www.thetvratingsguide.com/1991/08/1995-96-ratings-history.html
L&C s3 also beat The X-Files that year. It had a degree of mainstream popularity back then which no other superhero show has achieved since. Sadly the viewership more or less halved the following season.